<underfire> Understanding Vietnam Anti-War Movement
NAEEM MOHAIEMEN
nmohaiemen at mac.com
Wed Nov 1 13:08:58 EST 2006
There seems to be a streak of romantic nostalgia and longing for the
Vietnam Anti-war movement.
Why can't kids today just get it together, goes the collective sigh.
It's ahistorical to compare the size of the antiwar movement in
1968-1970 with that of 2006. You have to look at the entire buildup
from 1950s on to make a parallel comparison. Alexander Cockburn
points out that, as far back as 1954, Eisenhower secretly decreed
that Ho Chi Minh could not be permitted to win open elections. There
was no media revelation and the left took another decade to get up to
speed on Vietnam. Camelot worship was so strong that even Kennedy's
decision to send detachments of US troops as "advisors" to South
Vietnam (setting the stage for the assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem)
did not inflame an antiwar movement. It took the buildup all the way
to 1967/68 which led the organized left to stage large-scale,
successful antiwar rallies. All this occurred in an environment of
1968 and what felt like a worldwide anti-imperialist movement (which
also created incorrect predictions, as when Tariq Ali described the
massive upheavals in Pakistan as "people's power", but by 1971 the
movement had been hijacked by the middle class urban elite of the
Awami League who became leaders of an independent nation of Bangladesh).
The national draft was always a structural force that was the LARGEST
factor in creating and sustaining a massive antiwar movement, as well
as fomenting a major breakdown of military discipline and mass
desertions towards the end of the war. As described in the film SIR,
NO SIR, the movement spread to barracks, aircraft carriers, army
stockades, navy brigs, military bases and elite military colleges
like West Point. According to the Pentagon’s own figures, 503,926
desertions occurred between 1966 and 1971. Over a hundred underground
newspapers were published by soldiers; national antiwar GI
organizations were joined by thousands; and stockades and federal
prisons filled up with soldiers jailed for their opposition. By the
early 1970s, entire platoons refused to fight and
"fragging" (friendly fire killing commanding officers), rampant drug
use and open insubordination became the hallmark of a totally
demoralized army-- many of whom came home and became robust (and
invincible in the context of image politics) visual icons of the
antiwar movement.
Structurally today's conflict can NEVER produce that kind of movement
because joining the military is now an economic option, limited to
working class Black, Latino and White kids. By removing the middle
class and elite from the possibility of the draft, the military has
successfully defanged the key driver. In addition, we should not
under-estimate the shrewdness and adaptability with which the US Army
took concrete steps to professionalize the army and provide carrots
to mollify dissent (today considered one of the most integrated
organizations in America, providing "affirmative" opportunities
particularly to minorities).
Here's an excellent anti-recruitment flash animation created by a
group of young antiwar protest groups (Yes, Virginia, we contain
multitudes), which combines elements of SIR, NO SIR, with today's
anti-recruitment drives.
http://shobakorg.blogspot.com
http://shobakorg.blogspot.com/2006/11/not-your-soldier.html
More information about the Underfire
mailing list